Search Engine Optimization Blog

Optimize for top 10 natural rankings

Profitable Publishing in the Digital Age: the Archivist vs the Anarchist

Aaron Wall
December 02nd, 2008.

h3The Archivist/h3 pWhen I was about 1 year into the field of SEO my friend brought me over to his parent's house for a winter break for a few days. His dad is a genius (in about every way possible) and worked at the time as an archivist that digitized old content collections for media companies. I told him of what I did (SEO) and he told that I should learn XSLT, and that Google would soon kill the field of SEO. /p h3The Anarchist/h3 pI believed just the opposite...that SEO was an extension of marketing (which will only increase in demand as the web grows older), and that as Google's profits grew, they would use them to forge partnerships with content creators and build their own mini-web to supplement the greater web and give themselves a second bite at monetizing searchers. In the past few years Google added news results to their organic search results, bought YouTube, digitized a ton of books, settled a publisher and author lawsuit with books, created a books API, created Google Maps (and local), created Google Earth, created Google Maps, created Google Local, and Google just a href=http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/081202-100005purchased/a 20 million digitized historical newspaper pages from PaperofRedord.com. /p pSo far I am winning that bet, but only because I view SEO as an extension of marketing and have aggressively re-invested profits toward growth...which got me to thinking of publishing trends that will grow in the years to come. /p h3Publishing truths for the digital age/h3 ul liMany forms of scams and spam will look so much like real information that most people will not be able to distinguish between them./li liThe web has a deep and rich memory. But most people's use of it will remain shallow. /li liAs the world gets more complex, we will increasingly question authority and seek out experts to turn to for alternative view points and advice. /li liWe will subscribe to niche channels that largely match our biases and worldview. Information retrieval tools (search engines), information consumption tools (feed readers), and the social structure of the web (links, comments, how we use language) will further create a self-fulfilling prophecy on this front./li liCuriosity and the ease of publishing will turn a half billion people into experts connected to a passionate audience./li liAmongst that competition, there will always be an unquenchable demand for marketing, branding, and public relations./li liIf you sell information, accessibility and marketing will matter much more than being deep and/or factually correct./li lia href=http://www.openp2p.com/pub/a/p2p/2002/12/11/piracy.htmlPiracy is a cheap distribution channel/a./li lia href=http://www.traffick.com/2008/11/everyone-cant-do-it-for-ya-finding-your.aspThe tightness of a social network will be far more important than its raw size/a./li liIt is easier to build a large profitable revenue stream selling what is new rather than selling what is old./li liInformation without personalization and context will increasingly become commoditized. The average web page will be worth less than a cent unless there is a strong editorial voice associated with it and/or there are explicit votes for it. /li /ul h3Your Turn/h3 pWhat do you see changing as the web ages and grows?/p

No Comments

Charity SEO

Aaron Wall
December 01st, 2008.

pPeterD recently finished up a href=http://www.seobook.com/non-profit-guide-search-engine-marketingThe Non-profit Guide to Search Engine Marketing/a, a free 16 page guide to search engine marketing for non-profit organization websites. /p pa href=http://www.seobook.com/non-profit-guide-search-engine-marketingimg src=http://www.seobook.com/images/non-profit-sem.gif border=0/a/p pWhile it focuses on non-profits, much of the advice could apply to just about any website. We would love to get your feedback on it. If you find it useful or know some charities that might like it, please share. Thanks to Dominic Mapstone for early feedback and advice. :)/p

No Comments

The eBay Syndrome

Aaron Wall
November 30th, 2008.

peBay has recently seen a href=http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/ebay-traffic-plummetinga sharp drop in traffic/a as they cut their affiliate stream and Google ad spend. /p pimg src=http://www.seobook.com/images/ebay-traffic.png/p pWhen you are a default category leader you no longer compete against others in your category. You compete against other categories. Google and Amazon.com understand that. Microsoft maybe. eBay no. /p peBay could have used the last decade to create communities around buying, selling, and collecting...taking a slice of any transaction as they turn buyers to sellers or sellers to buyers. /p ul liThey could have offered awards for collector of the month, seller of the month, buyer of the month, and done interviews with the winners./li liThey could have a section called deal hunting where they offer tips on how to find the best deals./li liThey could have a section called good as new where people talk where people talk about old items that are a bargain, and in some cases even better than new./li liThey could have allowed sellers and buyers to build editorial communities and collections on the eBay site. Control the conversation and control commerce./li li What if eBay could have got you to tag just about everything you owned, and then told you roughly what it was worth (based on recent transaction data) and had you put a buy it now price on it? a href=http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000037.htmlCueCat was a failure/a, but eBay has a much better platform to market such a device on./li /ul pInstead they did nothing. They a href=http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/11/a-lost-decade-.htmllost a decade/a to improvements in search, Amazon.com, open source software, blogs, and the rest of the web. /p pRather than improving their network feedback mechanism and making a deeper network, the new eBay strategy is to try to be more like Amazon, but that won't work. While eBay spent a decade alienating buyers and sellers (with no innovation, shifting fees, encouraging a market lemons, etc.), Amazon was off building user loyalty. And now Amazon is out working public relations with a a href=http://www.amazon.com/review/holiday08holiday customer review team/a and a href=http://www.smartmoney.com/Investing/Stocks/Jeff-Bezos-on-the-Future-of-Amazon-com/extending their platform in new dimensions/a - offering digital downloads, the Kindle, selling utility computing, and selling their shopping platform./p pStaying competitive is more of a mindset than an event. The decay happens long before it impacts revenue. And by the time it impacts revenue there isn't a lot of time to fix things./p

No Comments

You Can’t Handle the Truth

Aaron Wall
November 30th, 2008.

pAll Truth passes through Three Stages: First, it is Ridiculed...br / Second, it is Violently Opposed...br / Third, it is Accepted as being Self-Evident.br / - Arthur Schopenhauer (1778-1860) /p pA business model that contains subtle white lies that are familiar and easy to like is often far more profitable than a business model built around attempting to change people's identities. This is precisely why so many business models are built around for Christians, for bloggers, or for charities./p pAs an entrepreneur it is worth considering the above quote when thinking about new business models, new platforms, new formats, and new algorithms. You could spend all your time trying to prove your vision of the truth, or modify it slightly so that others are willing to do the work for you. Your choice. :)/p pStart with a socially active core that identifies with what you have to offer and give them the tools to help spread your message./p

No Comments

Google Launches a Sweet Competitive Research Keyword Research Tool

Aaron Wall
November 29th, 2008.

pThe Inside AdWords blog a href=http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/11/announcing-search-based-keyword-tool.htmlannounced/a the beta launch of a href=http://www.google.com/sktool/Google's Search-based Keyword Tool/a. To some degree the tool is a Compete.com knock off, but with a number of exceptions/p ul lithis tool is free/li liGoogle has more search data than Compete.com does/li lithis shows bid prices and search volume estimates next to keywords (like the Google Traffic Estimator)/li lithis shows your current page titles and keywords/li lithis shows the % of organic and paid traffic going to a URL/li /ul pFor any keyword, the Google Search-based Keyword Tool will show up to 800 related keywords with cost and search volume estimates. This tool also works to show you 100 keywords related to a site, and if you own a website they will show you thousands of keywords that they think you could bid on which are not already in your account. In addition they show your search share of voice (via ads and organic search results) for keywords. This data is easy to export using a handy export button./p pimg src=http://www.seobook.com/images/search-based-keyword-tool.png/p pThere are a variety of cool extra filters that can be applied on this tool, including.../p ul liminimum or maximum search volumes/p libid price range lilow, medium, or high competition likeyword in URL licombining URL and keywords as filters likeyword + general category linegative keywords/ul pUsing a variety of different combinations for these filters you can see many different sets of 800 keywords even within the same subset. Export these different lists a variety of times and you can quickly build a list of thousands of high value keywords./p pIf you are a paying subscriber, a href=http://community.seobook.com/keyword-research-tools/4704-google-search-based-keyword-tool.htmlthis thread has a few more tips for how to get the most out of this tool/a./p

No Comments

Link Goodies

Aaron Wall
November 28th, 2008.

pHere are some interesting links of note./p pDanny Sullivan whinges about a href=http://searchengineland.com/crappy-mp3-sites-comment-spamming-enough-already-15629.phpall the flavors of spam killing the utility of the web/a./p pJohn Andrews on a href=http://www.johnon.com/630/ftc-truth-in-advertising.htmlthe absurdity of calling affiliate links spam/a./p pSlightly Shady SEO looks at a href=http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/googles-user-data-empire/Google's user data empire/a./p pAndrew Goodman on a href=http://www.traffick.com/2008/11/everyone-cant-do-it-for-ya-finding-your.aspwhy you have to target a tight niche to build a community/a. He also highlighted that display ads might be getting the credit they deserve, using a href=http://www.traffick.com/2008/11/let-attribution-debate-rage-on-and-on.aspa fun analogy/a:/p blockquotepAlexander Hamilton's face is on every $10 bill, but his brand isn't doing so hot. Thomas Jefferson, meanwhile, has a strong brand, and he's only on the 2, and there are hardly any of those in circulation. What is a fair CPM rate for either gentleman to pay for this type of exposure?/p/blockquote pSeth highlights that a href=http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/11/how-to-make-mon.htmlconnecting people is the easiest way to make money online/a. /p pBusiness.com offers SEO Book members a href=http://training.seobook.com/discounts-couponsa $50 off coupon/a when they submit a site to the Business.com directory. /p pSEO Black Hat is hosting another high level SEO conference, a href=http://seoblackhat.com/2008/11/25/countdown-to-rio/in Rio De Janerio/a./p pAt WembasterWorld Pubcon a href=http://www.brentdavidpayne.com/Brent D Payne/a mentioned that if you were covered in the Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, or any a href=http://www.tribuneinteractive.com/network/Tribune Interactive publication/a, but were not linked to, then you can a href=http://twitter.com/BrentDPaynesend him a tweet on Twitter/a and he will try to get your link added./p pStuntdubl announced a href=http://www.stuntdubl.com/2008/11/09/social-media-consulting/he is doing social media consulting/a again. He is probably amongst the top 3 social media marketers, along with a href=http://www.brentcsutoras.com/Brent Csutoras/a and a href=http://www.pingpongpie.com/Christopher Angus/a./p pJoost de Valk created a href=http://yoast.com/technorati-mint-pepper/a cool Mint Pepper to show Technorati backlinks/a./p pMicrosoft search a href=http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/23/microsoft-to-rebrand-search-will-it-be-kumo/may re-brand as Kumo/a. They would be better off buying Ask.com. /p pHere are some funny a href=http://www.rankedhard.com/SEO/a a href=http://www.webconfs.com/seo-comics.phpcomics/a./p h3Interviews amp; Meta-Me/h3 pI wrote a guest column for Search Engine Land about how a href=http://searchengineland.com/building-seo-momentum-by-using-a-consistant-site-structure-15441.phpusing a consistent site structure helps build your SEO momentum/a./p pI did a couple interviews recently. If interested, here is on on a href=http://www.gottaquirk.com/post/1783/aaron-wall-holistic-semGottaQuirk/a, and another on a href=http://palatnikfactor.com/2008/11/25/10-seo-questions-with-aaron-wall-from-seobookcom/PalatnikFactor/a./p pI was also interviewed in the recently published book a href=http://www.blogblazers.com/Blog Blazers/a. I have a couple copies of the book to give away...if you want one just comment below...first come first served :)/p

No Comments

Marketing Lessons from Google

Aaron Wall
November 24th, 2008.

ul liUnder-monetize to buy mindshare. (almost every category Google is in)/li liOffer a free version to make sure everyone who may want to has a chance to experience your product and/or service. (almost every category Google is in)/li liOffer something that forces people to keep coming back to your website. Alternatively, bundle your stuff into the browser. (the Google Toolbar is huge.)/li liInvest heavily in distribution deals and public relations. Keep making small changes and talking about how important they are so you stay in the media. Maintain that your success is because superior products even while you are buying marketshare./li liIf a business model competes with your model, try to guide the conversation and get market participants to attack each other to your own benefit (this, above all other reasons, is why it is strongnot smart/strong for professional SEOs to publicly endorse outing each other...nobody wins but Google)./li liOffer free or low cost versions of cash cows of competing services to distract them and/or force change upon them. (Google Docs)/li liEven when you have a market leading position, keep investing heavily in complimentary markets to reinforce your position as the default. Become ubiquitous. Become a verb. (mobile operating system)/li liWhen you tap out the potential of your product or service look for ways to make it deeper is select high value verticals. (onebox, universal search, site search)/li liWhen you have enough leverage and a large enough lead, change the market to put yourself at the center of it. (the Omnibox in Google Chrome)/li /ul h3I Missed Many Ideas.../h3 pWhat marketing lessons have you learned from watching Google?/p

No Comments

Did Google Win the War on Paid Links?

Aaron Wall
November 24th, 2008.

pJim Boykin recently claimed to have a href=http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/link-techniques/paid-links-arent-worth-it/kicked the paid links habit/a:/p blockquotepSo, the best thing for my company to do, if we want to stay out of the fire, is to make sure that We Build Pages adheres to the Google Guidelines, and that means we won’t be getting any more paid links for manipulating search engines./p/blockquote pWhen I first got on the SEO scene and quickly started buying links, one of the sites I kept running into was WeBuildPages. One of my friends jokingly called me the original link spammer but Jim Boykin started buying links before I did and was doing it with more scale than I did. To see Jim dismiss link buying outright seems like it is either over-reaction or link buying is nearing its death. /p h3Is Link Buying Nearing its Death? /h3 pWhen search click distributions may end up similar to the below graph how can one not want to push the limits?/p pimg src=http://www.seobook.com/images/traffic-by-rank.jpg/p pFor some keywords (and some entire business models) one or two rankings difference can be the difference between a profitable business model and a money loser. Yes real businesses should not be so reliant on Google that Google can chose to kill them, but there are a lot more people doing business with me too offers than there are creative and original people offering significant value added services from a unique approach. /p pMost business models are arbitrage, and Google wants to claw away as much of the easy value as they can, forcing you to a href=http://www.johnon.com/617/brand-domains.htmlspend on brand building/a. /p h3The Cost of Branding/h3 pMost traditional businesses are lucky to have a 10% or 20% profit margin. When one company controls 70% of the search market (closer to 90% in some niches and some geographic regions) it is easy for them to exert enough influence on a business (through quality scores, hand edits, threats) to move it from having 10% profit margins to losing money. /p pMany regional offline brands a href=http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/11/watching-the-ti.htmlare dying/a because their cost structure does not work on a network of infinite competition. /p pMany online brands are money losers or break even at best, with some a href=http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2003/feb/09/dotcoms_turning_into/losing hundreds of millions of dollars before coming profitable/a. Some of the more savvy online companies (like Monster.com, Expedia, and BankRate) may break even on the brand and leverage the brand to build out profitable networks of thin websites that allow them to double or triple dip in the organic search results./p h3Death Grip Growing Stronger/h3 pGoogle's death grip on the web is only growing stronger. While the web and search are making some bulky business models (like that of the NYT) irrelevant, in response the New York Times publishes articles about how a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/24/business/media/24carr.html?_r=1amp;partner=rssamp;emc=rssamp;oref=sloginGoogle Seduces With Utility/a:/p blockquotep“The most powerful form of advertising is to be exceptional,” said Ranjit Mathoda, an investor and technologist who blogs at Mathoda.com. “Google has created an ecosystem that perpetuates itself by being useful.”br / ...br / “We do have a philosophy that our products should speak for themselves. We tend not to make a lot of noise,” said Jeff Huber, senior vice president for engineering at Google./p/blockquote pGoogle is the front door to the web. And while Google is getting credited for not making noise and being exceptional they use their ad platform to give themselves free distribution in any vertical they want to compete. /p pPart of Google rising to such dominance was their aggressive bundling of their toolbar on computers through deals with OEMs and other software companies. Now that Google has a browser they want to take it one step further by doing a href=http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5201289.eceChrome distribution deals/a:/p blockquotepSundar Pichai, Google Vice President, Product Management, revealed that Chrome will be ready to come out of “beta” testing by January, and that the search giant was looking at ways to make Chrome the browser of choice for the everyday user./p p“We will probably do distribution deals,” he said, adding, “we could work with an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and have them ship computers with Chrome pre-installed.”/p/blockquote pChrome replaces the address bar with a search box. More search volume for Google./p h3Do You Still Buy Links? Do Your Friends?/h3 pKnowing how good Google is at marketing and that they are still gaining marketshare, do you still buy links? How has your link building and link buying strategy changed over the past year or two?/p

No Comments

Interview of Greg Jarboe on PR, SEO, Video Optimization, and the Chicago SES Conference

Aaron Wall
November 21st, 2008.

pI met Greg Jarboe at my very first SEO conference about 5 years ago and have chatted with him many times over the years. Recently we conducted an interview via email. /p pstrongYou are speaking at SES on a variety of topics from the first timers guide to SES and SEM, to an introduction to SEM, to SEO for video content. What are your favorite topics to talk about?/strong/p pI'm also speaking about turning PR efforts into SEO results as well as teaching the optimizing for universal search workshop with Amanda Watlington of Searching for Profit. So, I plan to get a pair of roller skates in order to make it to all five sessions in time. It's sort of funny how all this landed on my to-do list, but I think that it's a an example of being lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time. A couple of years back, SEO-PR pioneered press release optimization. It was a niche -- and it got our foot in the door. Then, we branched out -- and started optimizing video for YouTube. At that point, Amanda and I starting teaching workshops entitled Getting found in all the right places, which covered getting found in Google News, YouTube, and other vertical search engines. Then, on May 16, 2007, Google introduced universal search -- incorporating information from a variety of previously separate sources – including videos, images, news, maps, books, and websites – into a single set of results. So, all of those niches that we had focused on in the early days had suddenly gone mainstream. This also fundamentally changed how you can best optimize content to gain natural or organic traffic -- because we no longer live in an era of 10 blue links. So, which one of these topics is my favorite? It's video search engine optimization. In fact, I'm writing a book for Sybex entitled: YouTube and Video Marketing: An Hour A Day. It's part of the series that includes Web Analytics: An Hour A Day by Avinash Kaushik. So, I'm pretty focused on video right now. /p pstrongHow has video changed the SEO game? Do you recommend submitting to YouTube and other third party sites, or hosting video content on your own sites?/strong/p pHosting video content on your own site was the right thing to do in 2005, when Google Video, Yahoo! Video, Singingfish and other video search engines were the leaders in online video. But, in 2006, YouTube came out of left field -- and totally changed the game. That's why Google paid $1.65 billion to acquire YouTube, a video sharing site. It had beat all the video search engines hands down. According to Hitwise, YouTube accounted for 76% of all U.S. visits to online video websites in October 2008. Google Video had less than 4%. Yahoo! Video changed its focus to Yahoo-hosted video only in February of this year. And Singingfish has ceased to exist as a separate service. So, if you host video content on your own site, you're optimizing it for less than 4% of all U.S. visits. A much smarter strategy is to submit your video to YouTube, which gets about 20 times more visits, and then embed your YouTube videos in your website or blog./p pstrongOf the Search Engine Strategy conferences in the US, Chicago has traditionally been one of the smaller conferences. For a person new to SEO how can the smaller size benefit them?/strong/p pSES Chicago will attract about 2,000 attendees, which SES San Jose got more than 6,000. So, yes, it is a smaller conference. But, it's the only SEM conference in the Midwest, so most of the people you see at SES Chicago aren't ones that you'll already seen at other conferences. In fact, 87% of attendees at last year's SES Chicago were new to SES, just 13% were alumni. And 85% of the SES Chicago attendees approve or recommend purchasing decisions. So, the quality of the audience is very high. I find that means the Qamp;A sessions are not only lively -- they are lively at all of the SES events -- but people come away feeling that they got their questions answered./p pstrongWhen I first got started with SEO, I remember sitting at a table with your partner Jamie and you, as you guys discussed some of your tips. Since then you have become more and more well known in the search marketing space. What were some of your keys to that growth in exposure and awareness?/strong/p pIt takes time for new ideas to catch on. So, part of this is just persistence. But the other part is the willingness of many of our clients to share their case studies with the rest of the industry. When we started in early 2003, press release optimization was an interesting concept. Then, we were able to show that optimized press releases had generated $200 million in qualified leads for a href=http://www.seo-pr.com/generate-sales-leads-with-press-release-optimization.shtmlSymmetricom’s chip-scale atomic clocks/a, more than $2.5 million in ticket sales for a href=http://www.seo-pr.com/southwest-airlines-seo-pr-golden-ruler-award.shtmlSouthwest Airlines/a, and almost 1.3 million searches for “florists” on a href=http://seopr.prwebdirect.com/releases/2004/12/prweb188131.phpSuperPages.com/a. Later, we were also able to explain how combining blog outreach with press release optimization generated a record 450,000 unique visitors to a href=http://www.seo-pr.com/increase-website-traffic.shtmlThe Christian Science Monitor/a, more than 85,000 entries into Parents magazine’s cover kid photo contest, and a record 1,100 attendees to the a href=http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/alumni/wharton125/events/finale/Wharton Economic Summit/a. So, if there is a tip, I say focus on measuring business outcomes instead of traditional PR outputs, like the number of clippings. Money talks. The other stuff walks./p pstrongWith universal search and authority based search relevancy algorithms it seems Google keeps placing more and more weight on public relations. Are you surprised at how far this has come over the past few years? How far do you see these fields merging?/strong /p pActually, David Dalka a href=http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/21/ses-san-2007-jose-day-1-universal-blended-vertical-search/posted an item to his blog/a about a year-and-a-half ago that said, One can’t help but notice that if Greg Jarboe had gone to Google and designed Universal Search himself he likely couldn’t have designed it (better) to play into his strength areas in news and pr related issues. But, I didn't go to Google and I didn't design Universal Search. Nevertheless, it does play to our strength in public relations. We were among the first to recognize the getting links from blogs with a lot of authority wasn't a technical skill. It required public relations skills./p pstrongWhen should a new site consider using public relations as an SEO strategy? What are the keys to effectively using public relations as an SEO strategy?/strong/p pBefore it is launched. As it is being launched. And after it is launched. As for the keys, here is what the Google Webmaster Help Center says, It is not only the number of links you have pointing to your site that matters, but also the quality and relevance of those links. Creating good content pays off: Links are usually editorial votes given by choice, and the buzzing blogger community can be an excellent place to generate interest./p pstrongWhen should people consider outsourcing PR, and how much of it should be driven by internal resources?/strong/p pWe've trained PR departments as well as PR agencies. So, it isn't that important whether this is outsources or handled internally. It is important to start -- and then to continue updating your skills -- because learning SEO isn't like learning the multiplication tables. The search engines are constantly changing -- and Universal Search is just an example of one of the bigger changes we've since in the past five years. So, learn how to optimize press releases, then learn how to optimize blogs and RSS feeds, then learn how to optimize video for YouTube, then keep learning./p pstrongWhile in Chicago what dish should everyone make sure they eat?/strong/p pIf you don't eat some Chicago-style deep dish pizza, then you haven't been to Chicago. You were just visiting some big city in the Midwest./p p----/p pThanks Greg. /p pCheck out a href=http://www.seo-pr.com/SEO-PR/a to learn more about Greg and the intersection of public relations and search./p

No Comments

The Moral Authority of a Search Engine

Aaron Wall
November 20th, 2008.

pJohn Andrews highlights the fallacy of a href=http://www.johnon.com/622/seo-pricing.htmlmake good content/a/p blockquotepIf we follow this “make good content” path eventually the search engines will fail to deliver meaningful search results, either because of the excessive noise or because they enjoy such a monopoly they find market exploitation irresistably more rewarding. At that point the White Hat SEOs won’t know what to do anymore, and the creators/artists will refuse to work for the nickels offered. The web will become the cesspool Google says it already is. /p/blockquote pSo much is lost in the attention whoring that is claimed to be professional SEO that less than 1 in 100 professionals understand the above and are willing to think it through to its end./p pstrongUsing critical thinking skills/strong does not make one a terrorist or a black hat individual. We are not the ones promoting infidelity (a href=http://www.seobook.com/inappropirate-and-somewhat-offensive-adsense-ad-gmailas Google has done for years/a)./p

No Comments